b05 replying to: sayangel

It is a pure and simple supression of speech on what we were told was a "sufficiently decentralized" network. While I appreciate your valiant attempt at spinning this as providing choice, that's bullshit.

Those choosing to stay on the primary client aren't choosing a client, they chose to sign a contract explicitly based upon, introduced as, and themed as a dictatorship and were given specific examples of the implementation of that dictatorship by seeing their friends, collaborators, and acquaintances banned.

They chose to be lab rats for Balaji's experiment to determine what humans would be willing to accept. While he's busy laughing over the results with Thiel and his fellow corporate dictatorship advocates, we're all stuck in stupid until the real network forks.

-- {no channel}

hash
880713f45c3ccfefc01dd3e6a1b7744284cf9bab
timestamp
2026-11-04T12:55:04.000Z
fid
196142
parent_fid
1725
parent_hash
a86105080a66ec11ed6cd064b6bf5980b2845287
root_parent_hash
a86105080a66ec11ed6cd064b6bf5980b2845287