cameron replying to: sayangel

I mean there’s a big caveat in that all the bans are based on new rules that are being retroactively enforced.

People “broke” rules that didn’t exist previously and were not given any opportunity to operate within the changes.

Granted, I think eventually those people would’ve probably been banned anyway, but there’s something pretty lame about punishing someone for behavior that was completely within the platforms rules for years.

-- {no channel}

hash
f49a204f5738caa9ff2340796a43a61428f2e470
timestamp
2026-11-04T12:17:31.000Z
fid
617
parent_fid
1725
parent_hash
a86105080a66ec11ed6cd064b6bf5980b2845287
root_parent_hash
a86105080a66ec11ed6cd064b6bf5980b2845287