yerbearserker replying to: sayangel

So I think we're once again encountering the issues around the fact that the Client and the Protocol have the same name.

Were people effectively deplatformed off of the Farcaster (Primary Main) Client? Yes they were. (Which is absolutely a choice allowed by the new owner)

Were they removed from the Farcaster protocol? Nope, b/c it doesn't work that way.

Your discord analogy feels pretty useful here, & I agree with your line of reasoning.

Could it also have been managed by having two flavours/skins of the Farcaster Client go live on Day 1? Yep.

Could've been the same Client/Tools/etc but for the NS Surface using the different filter, allowing/inviting people to the experience of that flow/flavour & be compared to the Primary feed as well. 🤷‍♂️

Could've also set up a mechanism for others to roll out other flavours upon the same main client too, by being able to change the filtering/presentation... basically different feeds. Like... Warpletcaster where it only surfaces Warplet content 😉

-- {no channel}

hash
667c762c4dd14a24f04b84898891aa67decb134e
timestamp
2026-11-04T08:54:32.000Z
fid
409857
parent_fid
1725
parent_hash
a86105080a66ec11ed6cd064b6bf5980b2845287
root_parent_hash
a86105080a66ec11ed6cd064b6bf5980b2845287